Alternative Approaches for Qualitative Microbiological Method Matrix Additions

Megan S. Brown, Patrick M. Bird, Sharon Brunelle, W. Evan Chaney, Charles A. Kennett, J.David Legan, Ryan D. Maus, Laurie Post, Stephanie Pollard Biblographic citation: Food Protection Trends, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 152-162, Jan 2021 Volume 41, Issue 1: Pages 152–162

Most commonly used pathogen detection methods have undergone a rigorous validation through third-party certification bodies such as AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Association Française de Normalisation, MicroVal, and others. These validations focus on sensitivity, robustness, and inclusivity and exclusivity of the assay target(s) for the matrices submitted to the certification body. This creates a list of officially validated matrices that falls far short of what is seen routinely during end-user testing. Thorough validation of all matrices at all test portion sizes is neither cost efficient, practical, nor arguably necessary. Here, we provide guidance on alternate evaluation approaches using a food-similarity grouping and a risk-based questionnaire to help end-users determine an appropriate level of evaluation of their method of choice. In reducing the burden of evaluation for many matrices, these alternative approaches may allow more matrices to be evaluated, thus strengthening confidence in method application and ultimately leading to a safer food supply.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to the Journal of Food Protection® and Food Protection Trends to stay up to date on the information you need, including scientific research and articles reporting on a variety of food safety and quality topics.

Request Permission to Reuse Content

This link will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center where you can submit a request to reuse IAFP’s content found in our publications. Please note that no part of any publications may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without prior permission from IAFP.